)Your paper should include, but is not limited to:

a) A factual summary of the ethical dilemma that the organization experienced;

b) the organization’s reaction to this dilemma;

c) how the organization’s reaction to the situation affected each of the major stakeholders in this situation. Include each stakeholder’s position in this case and their reaction;

d) your opinion as to whether the organization responded in the most ethical manner possible;

e) several alternative responses that the organization could have taken and the probable consequences of each;

f) describe how the relationship between the organization and its stakeholders changed after this incident, if at all; etc.

)You must cite your work but may choose any method that you wish.

Grading Rubric

• A factual summary of the ethical dilemma that the organization experienced; (15pts.)
• The organization’s reaction to this dilemma; (15pts.)
• How the organization’s reaction to the situation affected each of the major stakeholders in this situation. Include each stakeholder’s position in this case and their reaction; (20pts.)
• Your opinion as to whether the organization responded in the most ethical manner possible; (15pts.)
• Several alternative responses that the organization could have taken and the probable consequences of each; (20pts.)
• Describe how the relationship between the organization and its stakeholders changed after this incident, if at all; (15pts.)

• Description of all relevant facts in the case.
• Identification and explanation of the ethical dilemma.
• Organized / Well-written / Coherent

• Comprehensive explanation of the organization’s reaction to the dilemma.
• Organized / Well-written / Coherent

• Description of the effect of the organization’s reaction on each major stakeholder.
• All major stakeholders addressed.
• Each stakeholder’s position in the case.
• Each stakeholder’s reaction to the organization’s reaction.
• Organized / Well-written / Coherent

• Well justified opinion regarding whether the organization’s response was the most ethical or not, and why.
• Organized / Well-written / Coherent

• Identification and explanation of all reasonable alternative responses that the organization could have taken.
• Probable consequences (comprehensive) of each alternative response.
• Organized / Well-written / Coherent

• Explanation of the change in the relationship between the organization and the stakeholders due to the incident.
• Each stakeholder addressed.
• Organized / Well-written / Coherent